1. Poster presentation - 12th World Conference on Lung Cancer, Seoul, South Korea, September 1-5, 2007
Radiation pneumonitis (RP) in lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) and thoracic radiation (TR): Retrospective analyses of patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center
2. Poster presentation - ASCO Breast Cancer Symposium 2007, San Francisco, CA, September 7-8, 2007
Return of estrogen-dependence and anti-estrogen response in ERa-breast cancer after mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibition via MAP kinase, epidermal growth factor receptor, or erbB-2
2008 ACP Scientific Meeting Abstract Submission, Sep 2008
2008 ACP Associates Meeting Abstract
2007 ACP Scientific Meeting Abstract Submissions, Sep 2007
2007 ACP Associates Meeting Abstract
2006 ACP Scientific Meeting Abstract Submissions, Sep 2006
2006 ACP Associates Meeting Abstract
2006 ACP National Abstract Submissions, Oct 2005
2005 ACC Abstract Submissions, July 2005
2005 ACP Scientific Meeting Abstract Submissions, May 2005
2005 ACP Associates Meeting Abstract Submission, JAN 2005
2005 ACP National Abstract Submissions, Oct 2004
2004 ACC Abstract Submissions, July 2004
2004 ACP Scientific Meeting Abstract Submissions, May 2004
2004 ACP Associates Meeting Abstract Submission, JAN 2004
2004 ACP National Abstract Submissions, OCT 2003
ACC Abstract Submissions, JUL 2003
ACP Scientific Meeting Abstract Submissions, MAY 2003
ACP Associates Meeting Abstract Submissions, JAN 2003
ACP Associates Meeting Abstracts 2002
2003 ACP National Abstract Submissions, OCT 2002
Criteria and Grading System Sheet Criteria
Associates Clinical Vignette Competition: Poster Division Finals
Judges are asked to consider the following criteria when grading posters in the Poster Division Finals of the Associates Clinical Vignette Competition.
1. Significance: How significant or relevant are the poster's conclusions in increasing understanding of a disease process, or in improving the diagnosis or treatment of a disease state?
2. Presentation: How logical are the ideas presented in this poster? How interesting is the manner of presentation? How clearly written and free of significant grammatical problems is its abstract?
3. Methods: If applicable, how suitable is the design for the stated objectives, and how appropriate are any analysis techniques applied?
4. Visual Impact: How effective is this poster visually? How valuable is each figure and graph in furthering viewers' understanding of the subject?
5. Interview: How knowledgeable and conversant is the presenting author with the work presented in the poster?
Criteria and Grading System Sheet
Associates Research Competition
Poster Division Finals
Criteria
Judges are asked to consider the following criteria when grading posters in the Poster Division Finals of the Associates Research Competition.
1. Originality: How original is the concept presented in this poster? Or, how original is the new approach to an old problem?
2. Significance: How significant are the poster's conclusions in increasing understanding of a disease process, or in improving the diagnosis or treatment of a disease state?
3. Presentation: How logical are the ideas presented in this poster? How interesting is the manner of presentation? How clearly written and free of significant grammatical problems is its abstract?
4. Methods: If applicable, how suitable is the research design for the stated objectives, and how appropriate are any statistical techniques applied?
5. Visual Impact: How effective is this poster visually? How valuable is each figure and graph in furthering viewers' understanding of the research subject?
6. Interview: How knowledgeable and conversant is the presenting author with the research presented in the poster?