1. Poster presentation - 12th World Conference on Lung Cancer, Seoul, South Korea, September 1-5, 2007

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) in lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) and thoracic radiation (TR): Retrospective analyses of patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center

http://www.jto.org/pt/re/jto/fulltext.01243894-200708001-00964.htm;jsessionid=HQGVVvLykmNGDwvXtBllswB0wNny5prX34xsc0yT1XYYyHG8JCfB!65375592!181195628!8091!-1?index=1&database=ppvovft&results=1&count=10&searchid=1&nav=search

2. Poster presentation - ASCO Breast Cancer Symposium 2007, San Francisco, CA, September 7-8, 2007

Return of estrogen-dependence and anti-estrogen response in ERa-breast cancer after mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibition via MAP kinase, epidermal growth factor receptor, or erbB-2

http://www.asco.org/portal/site/ASCO/menuitem.34d60f5624ba07fd506fe310ee37a01d/?vgnextoid=76f8201eb61a7010VgnVCM100000ed730ad1RCRD&vmview=abst_detail_view&confID=52&abstractID=40193

2006 ACP National Abstract Submissions, Oct 2005

2005 ACC Abstract Submissions, July 2005

2005 ACP Scientific Meeting Abstract Submissions, May 2005

2005 ACP Associates Meeting Abstract Submission, JAN 2005

2005 ACP National Abstract Submissions, Oct 2004

2004 ACC Abstract Submissions, July 2004

2004 ACP Scientific Meeting Abstract Submissions, May 2004

2004 ACP Associates Meeting Abstract Submission, JAN 2004

2004 ACP National Abstract Submissions, OCT 2003

ACC Abstract Submissions, JUL 2003

ACP Scientific Meeting Abstract Submissions, MAY 2003

ACP Associates Meeting Abstract Submissions, JAN 2003

ACP Associates Meeting Abstracts 2002

2003 ACP National Abstract Submissions, OCT 2002

Criteria and Grading System Sheet
Associates Clinical Vignette Competition: Poster Division Finals

Judges are asked to consider the following criteria when grading posters in the Poster Division Finals of the Associates Clinical Vignette Competition.

1. Significance: How significant or relevant are the poster's conclusions in increasing understanding of a disease process, or in improving the diagnosis or treatment of a disease state?

2. Presentation: How logical are the ideas presented in this poster? How interesting is the manner of presentation? How clearly written and free of significant grammatical problems is its abstract?

3. Methods: If applicable, how suitable is the design for the stated objectives, and how appropriate are any analysis techniques applied?

4. Visual Impact: How effective is this poster visually? How valuable is each figure and graph in furthering viewers' understanding of the subject?

5. Interview: How knowledgeable and conversant is the presenting author with the work presented in the poster?

Judges are asked to consider the following criteria when grading posters in the Poster Division Finals of the Associates Research Competition.

1. Originality: How original is the concept presented in this poster? Or, how original is the new approach to an old problem?

2. Significance: How significant are the poster's conclusions in increasing understanding of a disease process, or in improving the diagnosis or treatment of a disease state?

3. Presentation: How logical are the ideas presented in this poster? How interesting is the manner of presentation? How clearly written and free of significant grammatical problems is its abstract?

4. Methods: If applicable, how suitable is the research design for the stated objectives, and how appropriate are any statistical techniques applied?

5. Visual Impact: How effective is this poster visually? How valuable is each figure and graph in furthering viewers' understanding of the research subject?

6. Interview: How knowledgeable and conversant is the presenting author with the research presented in the poster?